Social Security & Medicare Crisis: Why Neither Candidate Has a Real Plan for Medicare and Social Security’s Future

May 8, 2024 | Economy

The leading presidential candidates lack actionable plans to address the impending insolvency of America’s major welfare programs, Social Security and Medicare, despite urgent warnings from trustees.

The looming crisis of America’s two premier welfare programs, Social Security and Medicare, represents not just a fiscal emergency but a profound leadership failure. As the trustees of these programs ring alarm bells with their latest reports, the two leading presidential contenders—President Joe Biden and Former President Donald Trump—appear conspicuously absent in the arena of viable solutions.

Both candidates have, in essence, pledged allegiance to the status quo—a dangerous gambit with insolvency dates for Social Security and Medicare fast approaching in 2035 and 2036, respectively. This marginal delay in the expected depletion dates (previously 2034 for Social Security and 2031 for Medicare) hardly mitigates the urgency of reform. Yet, the response from the political sphere has been tepid at best.

The structure of these programs mandates automatic benefit cuts upon the depletion of their respective trust funds—a 21% reduction for Social Security and an 11% cut for Medicare’s Hospital Insurance. This isn’t speculative; it’s the pre-programmed future of these programs barring legislative intervention. The implications are dire, not just for current beneficiaries but for the entirety of the working populace who, arguably, will bear the burden of an ageing demographic and the escalating costs that accompany it.

The discourse from both presidential candidates lacks the depth and commitment needed to navigate this crisis. They have reduced their platforms to superficial assurances, designed to placate rather than address the underlying issues. For instance, Trump’s flirtation with the idea of cuts was quickly retracted amidst political backlash, highlighting a lack of conviction or a strategic retreat from controversy. Similarly, Biden’s outright rejection of a proposal to raise the retirement age demonstrates a disconnect from the actuarial realities these programs face.

The proposal by some Republicans to increase the retirement age to 69 is met with resistance, yet it represents one of the few tangible suggestions on the table. It’s a modest start, but far from sufficient to avert the financial collapse of these programs. What’s needed is a fundamental reevaluation of how these benefits are structured and funded.

Meanwhile, both leaders seem more intent on weaponizing the issue for electoral gain rather than forging a bipartisan approach to sustainable reform. This political gamesmanship is symptomatic of a broader governance issue where electoral calculus often trumps substantive policy-making.

As we edge closer to the election, the American electorate deserves more than reassurances. They require a detailed, actionable plan that not only averts the impending insolvency but also reimagines the framework of these programs to ensure their longevity and sustainability. The debate should not be whether to cut or not to cut; rather, the discussion must focus on how we can innovate in our approach to welfare, perhaps reducing dependency through enhanced private savings options and more robust, market-driven healthcare solutions.

Moreover, addressing the inefficiencies in healthcare expenditure must be prioritized. This goes beyond mere cost-cutting; it involves a strategic overhaul of how resources are allocated and used in the Medicare system. The broader economic repercussions are equally daunting; the specter of higher taxes and reduced economic growth looms large, necessitating a shift from a purely tax-funded model to one that encourages greater personal investment and responsibility.

The time for political posturing is over. As the trustees’ report makes abundantly clear, the fiscal clock is ticking, and without bold, decisive action, the economic and social fallout will be profound. The next president, whoever that may be, must come to terms with this reality and muster the political will to lead a comprehensive overhaul of these critical programs. The future fiscal health of the nation depends on it.


Will there ever be a realistic plan to prevent the bankruptcy of Social Security and Medicare as their insolvency dates approach? Leave a comment…


Must watch videos on the RTD Blog!!!




Central Bank Digital Currencies: Total Control and End of Privacy?

90% of central banks are investigating CBDC’s, as we enter 2023. They understand that CBDC’s must offer the public trust, secure and scalable system, before rolling out anything, because they get one shot with a new system.


    Five Reasons to Rethink the Dollar

    Start Your Dollarcation With RTD University

    Get This FREE E-Book Now!!!

    * indicates required

    Support RTD On Patreon Here:

    Controlled Demolition of the American Empire Book

    Get Your RTD Silver Round Here


    Find out the latest from RTD by joining the mailing list. Your information is 100% confidential.

    * indicates required