The Scale of Injustice: How Big Banks Dodge the Bullet Unlike Binance

Apr 30, 2024 | Finance

There’s significant disparities in financial regulation and criminal accountability between large financial institutions and smaller entities like Binance, underscoring a systemic bias that protects major banks from severe personal consequences despite their infractions.

The glaring double standards in financial regulation and criminal accountability between corporate giants and smaller entities like Binance are becoming increasingly hard to ignore. This distinction not only showcases the disparities in justice but also illustrates a systemic resilience designed to protect the largest players regardless of their misdeeds.

The Untouchables: Big Banks vs. The Underdogs

Consider the case of Changpeng Zhao, the CEO of Binance. Zhao faces not only a hefty personal fine but also potential jail time for his company’s compliance failures, which include violations of the Banking Secrecy Act. The stark contrast becomes evident when you line this up against the fate of executives from the world’s largest banks, who have repeatedly skirted personal consequences despite their institutions paying massive fines for severe regulatory breaches.

  • Binance was fined $4.3 billion for a series of compliance failures including failing to report over 100,000 suspicious transactions and allowing transactions with sanctioned entities.
  • BNP Paribas faced an $8.973 billion fine for actions supporting state-sponsored terrorism through illegal financial activities in countries like Sudan, Iran, and Cuba, yet no executives faced personal charges.
  • JPMorgan Chase paid $13 billion in relation to the subprime mortgage crisis and for its role in underwriting risky loans, again with no jail time for decision-makers.
  • Bank of America accrued $30.6 billion in fines across various settlements tied to mortgage and foreclosure abuses, without any personal repercussions for its top brass.
  • HSBC Bank USA settled for $1.256 billion over accusations of laundering money for drug traffickers, yet individual accountability remained off the table.
  • Wells Fargo settled for $3 billion due to a scandal over its aggressive sales practices, but, as with the others, no executives went to jail.

Systemic Favoritism: The Unassailable Might of Major Financial Institutions

What these patterns reveal is not just a failure of regulatory frameworks but a systemic bias that perpetuates the invulnerability of financial behemoths. It’s critical to ask why these institutions remain largely untouchable despite recurring infractions that impact global economic stability and ethical business conduct.

The ramifications of such systemic favoritism are profound, creating a landscape where true accountability seems to evade those with enough resources and connections. It raises the alarming prospect that these entities are prepared and equipped to withstand any economic disasters, maintaining their status and power irrespective of their actions.

This state of affairs not only undermines public trust in financial systems but also challenges the very principles of justice and equality under the law. The narrative that emerges is not just one of financial injustice but also of a protected upper echelon in the global economy, one that can seemingly navigate above the rules that bind smaller companies and individuals.

As we continue to scrutinize these issues, the question remains: how can we ensure that justice and accountability in the financial sector are not just for those without the means to evade them? The path forward requires rigorous enforcement of existing laws, genuine reforms to close loopholes, and perhaps most importantly, a cultural shift among regulators to hold all players, big and small, to the same standards. This will be essential to restoring balance and fairness in a system rife with disparities.


What are your thoughts on the double standard amongst criminal banking institutions? Leave a comment…


Must watch videos on the RTD Blog!!!




Real Estate Bubble Bursting: American Dream Destroyed

After World War II ended, the U.S. entered a new era of unprecedented prosperity. Homeownership was practically considered a right, not just a privilege, as Americans who worked hard and saved their money had very little difficulty owning a home they could call their own.


    Five Reasons to Rethink the Dollar

    Start Your Dollarcation With RTD University

    Get This FREE E-Book Now!!!

    * indicates required

    Support RTD On Patreon Here:

    Controlled Demolition of the American Empire Book

    Get Your RTD Silver Round Here


    Find out the latest from RTD by joining the mailing list. Your information is 100% confidential.

    * indicates required